<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtualizing Mac OS X on VMware Fusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/</link>
	<description>About virtualization and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:12:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#124; Iphone 3G &#38; 3GS</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#124; Iphone 3G &#38; 3GS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guide4Iphone.dk &#187; Blog Archive Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#187; Guide4Iphone.dk</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Guide4Iphone.dk &#187; Blog Archive Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#187; Guide4Iphone.dk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple consente due istanze virtualizzate di OS X per ogni Mac &#124; kimblo Network Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple consente due istanze virtualizzate di OS X per ogni Mac &#124; kimblo Network Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>[...] è stata fatta tanta. Sebbene infatti, almeno in teoria, OS X fosse tranquillamente virtualizzabile tanto su un computer Mac che Windows, di fatto l’accordo di licenza fornito fino a Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard non consentiva [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] è stata fatta tanta. Sebbene infatti, almeno in teoria, OS X fosse tranquillamente virtualizzabile tanto su un computer Mac che Windows, di fatto l’accordo di licenza fornito fino a Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard non consentiva [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leeuw van twee gevirtualiseerde gevallen van Mac OS X per machine toe &#124; Apple Nieuws Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeuw van twee gevirtualiseerde gevallen van Mac OS X per machine toe &#124; Apple Nieuws Flash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>[...] zonder Mac-hardware aanbod op een een-op-een-basis. Terwijl de vanille versie van Mac OS X is  theoretisch virtualiseerbare  sinds de Intel overgang (en in feite  kan worden uitgevoerd op een virtuele machine nu  onder de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] zonder Mac-hardware aanbod op een een-op-een-basis. Terwijl de vanille versie van Mac OS X is  theoretisch virtualiseerbare  sinds de Intel overgang (en in feite  kan worden uitgevoerd op een virtuele machine nu  onder de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#124; TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#124; TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#124; Freak Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#124; Freak Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: likeithateitshareit &#187; Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>likeithateitshareit &#187; Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#171; Mac City</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Lion to allow two virtualized instances of Mac OS X per machine &#171; Mac City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having to supply Mac hardware on a one-to-one basis. While the vanilla version of Mac OS X has been theoretically virtualizable since the Intel transition (and in fact can be run on a virtual machine now under the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blah</title>
		<link>http://www.van-lieshout.com/2009/09/virtualizing-mac-os-x-on-vmware-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.van-lieshout.com/?p=611#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>--- don&#039;t work on fusion 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212; don&#8217;t work on fusion 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

